|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Dave Stark
5350
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 10:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Shalua Rui wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:So your point is that because structure shooting sucks and no one likes it... that somehow makes mining awesome, acceptable gameplay that isn't a step away from botting? No, my point is: All forms of gameplay in EVE have dull and uninteresting sides, and if CCP tries to reduce those, I'm all for it... but all folks like you see is: Evil miners are runing my pew pew.  While everything in EVE has *some* boring aspects, mining is the only thing that is nothing but a boring aspect. Besides, I just bump and gank them because "I'm doing my part" to stop botting.
if you want to do your part to stop bots; report them. |

Dave Stark
5350
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:March rabbit wrote: yea...
paying subscription, buying ships, buying stuff, selling ore/minerals, competing for ice, providing targets for other people == 'actively not playing the game'
i like your logic
No, sitting in a belt pressing F1 every half an hour is actively not playing the game. Do try to keep up.
you mean, the same thing people in null do with ishtars?
also, if you've ever tried to mine in high sec, you'd realise it's closer to about 4 mins, than 30. |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dave Stark wrote: you mean, the same thing people in null do with ishtars?
also, if you've ever tried to mine in high sec, you'd realise it's closer to about 4 mins, than 30.
Ice mining is a tad higher cycle time than regular mining, you are aware?
are you aware; they aren't. |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dave Stark wrote: you mean, the same thing people in null do with ishtars?
also, if you've ever tried to mine in high sec, you'd realise it's closer to about 4 mins, than 30.
Ice mining is a tad higher cycle time than regular mining, you are aware? are you aware; they aren't. hulk, 67 seconds ice cycle time. mackinaw 50.6 second ice cycle time. skiff 25.9 second ice cycle time. ore cycle time 121.8 seconds cycle time. *facepalm* Look. Granted, I mis spoke slightly, but what I'm talking about is that you can fill your ore hold on one ice node, while you have to swap occasionally between actual asteroids. My bad on that. But Ice mining is: One F1. Come back half an hour later, warp to station, unload, warp to belt, go back to step 1.
a mackinaw pulls in 142 blocks of ice per hour. it has space for 35. that's 18 cycles. that's 15.18 mins. (15 mins and 11 seconds)
so, it's not half an hour either. that also has the vastly flawed assumption that the ice asteroid hasn't popped during that time frame. |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
fun fact: 4 is closer to 15 than 30. \o/ also, for ore, it really is about 4. you know, that resource that's available pretty much all the time unlike ice. |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Yay so you're actually playing the game once every 15 minutes instead of half an hour.
Changes everything, now it's a shining example of engaging gameplay.
actually, i'm playing it the whole time. input is just required every 15 mins if i have perfect conditions.
by this logic, you must really hate PI since i only have to actually be playing the game once every 2 weeks.
also we've been through you're deeply flawed assumption of perfect conditions. missions require me to hit f1 more frequently but are as equally unengaging because there's nothing interesting about repeatedly pressing f1, regardless of the frequency.
pretending miners are somehow worse is laughable, especially when you've demonstrated you haven't got a clue. |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:So, I realized that I judged the time based on my own skills, to fly a bait Procurer. I hadn't realized that anyone could actually train up all those ice mining skills without going insane from boredom.
I don't particularly have an issue with PI. Or with research, or any of that other stuff. Mostly because they aren't in open space while they do it. And also because people who do those things tend not to ***** and moan about how they should be safe in open space.
so not interacting with the game is fine, you were just arguing that was the issue because you were parroting some one else's incorrect propaganda than using your own brain? |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dave Stark wrote: if you want to do your part to stop bots; report them.
So you know what the difference is between a miner who is afk, and one who is botting? I sure don't. It's like the Pepsi Challenge. "9 out of 10 Caldari Navy Antimatter shells can't tell the difference!" If reporting them worked, we wouldn't have to gank them.
yeah, i do know the difference; the difference is the ones that carry on mining after being reported aren't botting, because they didn't get banned for botting.
reporting them does work, you just want to pretend it doesn't so you've got some pretend moral high ground to stand on to justify ganking them [tip, this is eve, you don't need a false pretext to shoot some one.] |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 11:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:But not playing the game while logged in, in open space, and making money? That is not fine. It's actually far worse than mission running, despite how very bad that activity is for being engaging gameplay.
A miner doesn't even shoot anything, they just sit there. Like scenery.
if the lasers are on, the miner is playing the game. if the lasers are off, he isn't making money.
also fun fact; afking in an ishtar makes MORE money for LESS interaction. yet you don't go around ganking them now do you? (or you might, i don't know, but you sure don't whine about it as much that's for sure)
i'll be honest, i don't really care if you gank miners or not. if you enjoy ganking miners; power to you, do it all day long. what irked me and caused me to respond is the pathetic justification [if you enjoy it, just say it, be proud of it] and the outright lies.
just stop pretending that it's some kind of issue to "justify" what you're doing. like i said earlier, it's not eve, you don't need some kind of pretend pretext. |

Dave Stark
5351
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 12:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
also fun fact; afking in an ishtar makes MORE money for LESS interaction. yet you don't go around ganking them now do you? (or you might, i don't know, but you sure don't whine about it as much that's for sure)
Of course I try to kill them. Noticeable difference though, way more of them try to get away because they're actually at their keyboards. Bagged two Oracles in short succession with my SB character last week, though. Renters, yeesh.
no, it's easier for them to get away because it's far easier to identify hostiles outside of high sec. |
|

Dave Stark
5352
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 12:12:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Both warrant their destruction.
and power to you. just stop pretending it's for some greater good rather than the fact that you find it hilarious and entertaining. :P |

Dave Stark
5353
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 12:17:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Both warrant their destruction. and power to you. just stop pretending it's for some greater good rather than the fact that you find it hilarious and entertaining. :P Of course it's hilarious and entertaining. It just so happens that it is for a greater good.
some sleeping pills will help you get to sleep at night, but with the added bonus that you don't need to lie to yourself. |

Dave Stark
5353
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 12:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:It just so happens that it is for a greater good. We'll see about that, when prices shift because recycling isn't as profitable/industry relevant anymore as it used to be... The greater good my a... 
mineral prices won't shift that much, ccp are dumping more minerals in high end ore in an attempt to make the prospector relevant rather than redundant. |

Dave Stark
5356
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 17:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Enraku Reynolt wrote:well, that's cause you probly shoot first then ask questions later, which never works You are assuming that you are asking the question to the people you are shooting.
you're assuming people will waste time talking to you when it offers 0 benefit to them, also. |

Dave Stark
5366
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 07:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Drak Morgan wrote:I like how the debate favors PvP and miners feel then need to weigh in...
tends to happen when people start spewing incorrect assumptions about things they know nothing about. |

Dave Stark
5366
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 08:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:they should scale with the inflation anyway, right? i'd love to see all the tears when ratting income is nerfed down to the same level as mining because bounties are tied to mineral values.
the cries of agony would be DELIGHTFUL. |

Dave Stark
5377
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:50:00 -
[17] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Well, all areas are currently ahead of tears. Mining is just staggeringly so.
So, tell me how Eve is about PvP again?
tell me first, how the bar for each activity is set at an identical level to justify some kind of "superiority" for those mining rather than pvping, mission running, or manufacturing. |

Dave Stark
5377
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:14:00 -
[18] - Quote
Erufen Rito wrote:If you guys wanted a clear indication of what makes eve tick, I'd say miners do. Carebear miners at that.
i'd like to know where the indicator is. in addition, explain how it's "clear". |

Dave Stark
5383
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
Solecist Project's Alt wrote:I'm surrounded by idiots.
i told you not to live in a hall of mirrors. you should listen to me more, sol. |

Dave Stark
5383
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Erufen Rito wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Erufen Rito wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Erufen Rito wrote:If you guys wanted a clear indication of what makes eve tick, I'd say miners do. Carebear miners at that. i'd like to know where the indicator is. in addition, explain how it's "clear". eveonline.com as i thought, you have nothing to substantiate your claim. Maybe you don't know how to use a website. It's right there, and the stats are visible if you click on the magic banner that leads to new places. Or maybe you don't know math. 50 is greater than 30, and so on. Or maybe, just maybe, you are just a troll....but come on, try harder.
or maybe you don't understand how evidence works (since you know, you haven't produced any). i mean, if linking a website was evidence i could win any argument i wanted with the justification of "google.com" |
|

Dave Stark
5383
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
and now explain how those arbitrary values are in any way balanced or equal.
without them, one group reaching an arbitrary and irrelevant amount before another has 0 meaning and isn't evidence. |

Dave Stark
5383
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:04:00 -
[22] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
and now explain how those arbitrary values are in any way balanced or equal.
without them, one group reaching an arbitrary and irrelevant amount before another has 0 meaning and isn't evidence.
One would imagine it's based on an average amount per hour. However, like subscription numbers, CCP has not released these. I think though the point being that not only have carebears pulled other and mined more, but every single other group has also gotten their shite together and done more. Thus far, anyway.
"one would imagine" is not evidence, it's assumption. |

Dave Stark
5385
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:06:00 -
[23] - Quote
Director Blackflame wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
and now explain how those arbitrary values are in any way balanced or equal.
without them, one group reaching an arbitrary and irrelevant amount before another has 0 meaning and isn't evidence.
One would imagine it's based on an average amount per hour. However, like subscription numbers, CCP has not released these. I think though the point being that not only have carebears pulled other and mined more, but every single other group has also gotten their shite together and done more. Thus far, anyway. You're still assuming that they're meant to be completed at the same rate. It's possible (and in fact it makes sense) that they made the goals for destruction harder, since that's ultimately what they want more of in this game than anything else. By this logic you would expect bounties to be nearing completion first but theyre in the same boat as isk destroyed.
you're trying to apply logic to arbitrary numbers some one pulled out of their ass so that we could track it to find out if we get +1 gecko or not. |

Dave Stark
5385
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:17:00 -
[24] - Quote
Director Blackflame wrote:I doubt ccp just pulled numbers out of their ass seeing as how they have access to how much isk is earned/destroyed on an average day they probably took that number and added a % to it.
i don't. |

Dave Stark
5385
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Last Wolf wrote:Kristalll wrote:Last Wolf wrote:Mined Volume 42.96% of 25.7 bill goal = 11.04072 bill 184,012 man/hours at 60,000 m3 per hour
NPC bounties 29.6% of 7.44 trill goal = 2.20224 trill 220,224 man/hours at 100mil per hour.
My assumptions were: average miner is getting 1,000 m3 per minute (60,000 per hour) and average ratter/missioner getting 100m per hour
Someone correct my maths if I am wrong. Ratters average clsoer to 60m and below. Mission runners don't make most of their money on bounties, so even if they are making 100m/hr, it's more like 30-40m on bounties. That would skew the numbers even more in favor of the ratters putting in more effort than miners. only if the arbitrary numbers that need to be reached have any relation to one another, of which there is 0 evidence. |

Dave Stark
5385
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:54:00 -
[26] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:average solo miner can pull about 3k+ / minute.
yeah no.
a max skilled hulk is pulling in 2629 m3/min, with orca boosts. so your 'average' solo miner isn't pulling in 3k+/min at all. |

Dave Stark
5526
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:08:00 -
[27] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Perhaps the bile some miners spew has to do with the constant bile spewed at them about being botters, being scum, being worthless etc.... Look at yourself and how you paint them before you throw stones at their behaviour. Then they should probably stop botting so much.
so should all the people in null sec with their ishtars. |

Dave Stark
5526
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Perhaps the bile some miners spew has to do with the constant bile spewed at them about being botters, being scum, being worthless etc.... Look at yourself and how you paint them before you throw stones at their behaviour. Then they should probably stop botting so much. so should all the people in null sec with their ishtars. If those guys are botting, then yeah, I agree. I'm talking about the part where CCP says the vast majority of bots are found in highsec, and of those the majority are miners.
that's probably because you can get max yield [for ice] from a 1 month old account. you can't get max anything out of a 1 month old character for anything else. hardly surprising most bots are mining [i suspect, ice] due to the low barrier to entry even if the isk is poor, the return on investment is quicker (and probably ultimately higher if the accounts get banned rapidly).
if other activities yielded such 'good' results for such a low sp investment then i'm sure they'd be heavily botted. |

Dave Stark
5526
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:22:00 -
[29] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:The vast majority of bots are in highsec. so that means the ishtars are also bots, because not all bots are in high sec. execllent. (yes, i'm being intentionally awkward.) |

Dave Stark
5526
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I don't recall FW being heavily botted yet it had an even lower SP investment for significantly higher returns. 'yet' |
|

Dave Stark
5526
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:24:00 -
[31] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Dave Stark wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:The vast majority of bots are in highsec. so that means the a small handful of ishtars are also bots, because not all bots are in high sec. execllent. (yes, i'm being intentionally awkward.) ftfy good catch. |

Dave Stark
5527
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:26:00 -
[32] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Really though the ishtar doesn't even need to be botted, it practically bots itself. as does mining. but apparently, people still do. vOv |
|
|
|